Roll out AI coding assistants without chaos.

Make engineers more productive with Claude Code, Cursor, or Copilot, without breaking review.

Why this matters

AI coding tools genuinely speed up engineers; 2–3x on routine tasks is common. But rolling them out badly creates inconsistent code, weakened review, and security drift. A little structure goes a long way.

What to do

  • Pick one tool to standardize on (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot).
  • Write a short internal doc with: when to use AI vs. when not to, what review still has to catch, and how AI-generated code should be flagged in PRs.
  • Make sure secrets aren't sent to AI services; configure exclude lists.
  • Set up a feedback channel for engineers to surface what's working.

Common pitfalls

  • Don't let AI write code in security-sensitive paths without elevated review.
  • Don't measure productivity by lines of code; AI inflates that without inflating value.
  • Don't assume your seniors are already using these tools well; even experienced engineers benefit from shared conventions.
Start a Project or email us

Want help applying this to your setup? Tell us where you're stuck.